This is going to be a long post because I have a lot of thoughts on this issue, and it was all spawned by a rather bitchy comment I saw someone — who normally goes around blasting off statuses about equal rights and whatnot — make on Facebook. With that being said, I’m going to place this under a cut. Before I do, just to reiterate what I’m going to talk about in case you do or don’t want to read it:
I’m going to talk about why shaming people for their virginity or their lack thereof pisses me the fuck off.
So, with that being said, dive under the cut if you’re interested.
- Having sex every day.
- Saving sex for your wedding night.
- Never having sex.
- Having sex with different people.
- Having sex with one person.
- Having sex with a person of your same gender.
- Loving sex.
- Hating sex.
- Being loud.
- Being quiet.The only thing wrong with sex?
When it’s not consensual.
Because that’s not sex. That’s rape.
Reblogging again because this post is so important.perfect
Mickey has nephews, Donald has nephews, Goofy has a son.
And he wasn’t adopted, he looks just like him.
Goofy… has had sex.
Goofy… has known a woman biblically.Imagine what it must’ve looked like.
Imagine what it sounded like.These are the things I think about when I wake up in the middle of the night, drenched in sweat.
GA-HYUK.
NIGHT BLOGGERS WILL RUIN YOUR ENTIRE FUCKING DAY
GA-HYUK
Why do you all forget Pete
Birth control is eugenics.
If you want to have sex pay for your own damn birth control.
Hi! I noticed that you assume that all people go on birth control to just to have sex. While that can be the case, and is nothing to be ashamed of, I’d like to share a little story.
You see, before I went on birth control, I had terrible periods. They were incredibly heavy to the point where I’d need to change pads and tampons every 45 minutes to an hour in order to keep the blood from leaking onto my panties and other clothes. I also had issues with clotting, which made god awful cramps EVEN WORSE. There were occasions where I’d miss school for a couple of days at a time because the pain was THAT unbearable.
If it weren’t for birth control, I’d still be having those problems. It might not seem like a “big deal” to you, but periods can be and are disabling for some people. Your ignorance to the many uses of birth control only shows that you really haven’t thought too much on the issue outside of “paying for people to have sex.”
Now, that we’re on the subject of sex, let’s examine your “I don’t want to pay for you to have sex” comment. You see, you won’t be paying for ME to have sex. You see, I, like you would be paying the same insurance company to provide me with services that pertain to my health, birth control included. Now, you might not agree with that, but say I didn’t agree with drinking alcohol, a recreational activity that offers no benefits whatsoever to the body. Say your excessive drinking causes your liver to shrivel up and cease functioning. Would it be logical for me to demand that our mutual insurance company not cover your liver transplant, simply because I don’t agree with the action that caused you to seek the medical service? No, it wouldn’t. Because your life and your personal choices have no effect on me, and I don’t get to have a say in what medical services you, a stranger, can and can not have. You see, you’re not paying for MY sexual habits. I’M paying for my own. And in the same token that I can’t deny or try to deny you health care, YOU can’t do the same for me.
See how that works?
Furthermore, do you not recognize the benefits of allowing people a health care service that will allow them to control if and when they have kids? Taking away from your obvious moral convictions against recreational sex, the benefits to being able to put off parenthood are virtually limitless. People who are mentally or emotionally not ready for kids can wait until the time they choose to begin procreation. People who want to begin a career to have a stable home FOR their kids can put off parenthood until they have a steady job. People who, to put it bluntly, simply don’t like or want kids won’t be saddled with a burden they will not take care of properly, and this can help control the number of children being placed into the foster care system. Logically speaking, this is not only a benefit for individuals, but for society as a whole. As your preoccupation with other people’s sex lives has clouded your ability to think critically and see these benefits.
And, before we get into the “if you don’t want kids, don’t have sex” bit, do you not realize how unnatural your request is? Yes, people can go without sex, if they so choose. But saying that those who don’t want kids, or who want to put off having kids should completely ignore their sexual urges and forget that we can be and are sexual beings is incredibly preposterous. Not to mention you’re projecting YOUR personal feelings about sex onto other people and expecting them to adhere to it. Quite frankly, the obsessive people like you have with what goes on with other’s genitals is disturbing. Perhaps you should see someone for that?
And lastly, to the original poster, CK: though modern birth control is, essentially, the child of modern eugenics, you do realize that birth control as used now is not a part of eugenics? You also realize that birth control methods have been used long before the modern eugenics movement, and therefore eugenics is more a part of birth control history, rather than the entirety of birth control itself? I’d suggest you do some thorough research on eugenics, as well as forms o birth control and birth control’s history, before you decide to do another post on the subject without providing any facts or sources to back up your pathetic claims.
I would also like to ask you something: what is it about “free birth control” is it that disgusts you? Is it that people can now have safer sex with less fear of unwanted pregnancy? Perhaps it’s because you’re afraid of people having sex in general? Or is it more that you don’t like uterus owners having agency over their own bodies, something we are constantly denied? I would very much like to know, because I only see benefits from having free birth control, and from what I can tell, the things that “disgust” you about it are the things we should be celebrating.
Lovely chatting with you guys :)
If I could hug a post, it’d be this one.
I am clapping at my computer right now.
- The clothes you wear don’t determine your gender
- The clothes you wear don’t determine your gender
- The clothes you wear don’t determine your gender
- The clothes you wear don’t determine your gender
- The clothes you wear don’t determine your gender
- The clothes you wear don’t determine your gender
- The clothes you wear also don’t determine your sexual orientation
- The only thing that clothes determine is whether or not you are naked.

“GENDER AND SEX ARE DIFFERENT”
GOD
FUCKING
BLESS
This is perfection.
See, that’s how simple it is.
BLESS THIS POST
DO
- CORRECT YOURSELF
- APOLOGISE
- THINK BEFORE YOU SPEAK
- USE THE RIGHT NOUNS/PRONOUNS/NAMES FROM NOW ON
DON’T
- THINK THEY SHOULD JUST ‘DEAL WITH IT’
- SAY THAT IF IT HAPPENED TO YOU IT WOULDN’T BE A BIG DEAL
- DO IT AGAIN
- AND AGAIN
- AND AGAIN
Men who want to flirt with women have to realize: Women live in a state of continual vigilance about sexual safety. It’s like having a mild case of hay fever that never goes away. It’s not debilitating. You’re not weak. You’re not afraid. You just suck it up and get on with your life. It’s nothing that’s going to stop you from making discoveries, or climbing mountains, or falling in love. Sometimes you can almost forget about it. It doesn’t mean it’s not there, subtly sucking your energy. You learn to avoid situations that make it worse and seek out conditions that make it better.
If a female stranger is wary around you, it is not because she suspects you are a rapist, or that all men are rapists. It’s because a general level of circumspection is what vigilance requires. Don’t take it personally.
If this frustrates you, try to remember that women are blamed for lapsed vigilance. If a woman does get raped, everyone rushes to see where she let her guard down. Was she drinking? Was she alone? Was she wearing a short skirt? Did she go to a strange man’s room for coffee at 4am?
A woman must be seen to be vigilant as well as be vigilant. If she is deemed insufficiently vigilant, she will be at least partly blamed for any sexual violence that befalls her. If she’s regarded as downright reckless, that “evidence” can be used to completely exonerate her rapist. If it comes down to a he said/she said dispute over whether sex was consensual, as so many rape cases do, the dispute becomes a referendum on whether the woman seems like the sort of reckless person who would have sex with a stranger.
If a woman does go back to a strange man’s hotel room at 4am, even if she only wants a coffee and conversation, she’s more or less given him the power to rape her. No jury is going to believe she went up there for anything but sex. So, don’t be surprised if a stranger reacts badly to that suggestion.
| — |
Attention, Space Cadets: Do Not Proposition Women in the Elevator I wish I didn’t need to reblog stuff like this. I wish people *got it*. But judging from the ridiculous response to these posts, stuff like this clearly still needs to be repeated. (via lavender-labia) This actually made me cry. Ugh. (via m0nikered) Will always reblog (via stfuconservatives) |
- Having sex every day.
- Saving sex for your wedding night.
- Never having sex.
- Having sex with different people.
- Having sex with one person.
- Having sex with a person of your same gender.
- Loving sex.
- Hating sex.
- Being loud.
- Being quiet.The only thing wrong with sex?
When it’s not consensual.
Because that’s not sex. That’s rape.
reblogging again because i can.

























